The Age of Entitlement:

Why Inequality, Social Media and the Loss of Courtesy Are Connected

Something has shifted in public life. Many people sense it, even if they struggle to name it. Everyday courtesy feels thinner. Patience seems shorter. Public debate is louder, harsher and more personal. At the same time, complaints about entitlement have become common across generations. Older people often accuse younger people of expecting too much, while younger people look at housing prices, insecure work and widening inequality and ask why they should accept so little.

These changes are often treated as separate problems. They are not. The growth in entitlement, economic disparity, declining politeness and the rise of social media are connected by a deeper social pattern: people are comparing more, trusting less and feeling increasingly disconnected from one another.

Economic inequality is a powerful starting point. When people believe hard work will lead to a secure life, they are more likely to accept the rules of the game. But when housing becomes unaffordable, wages feel stagnant and wealth appears concentrated in fewer hands, that belief begins to fracture. People do not simply become poorer in financial terms; they become more anxious about status, fairness and dignity. They begin to ask not only what they have, but what they have been denied.

Social media magnifies this anxiety. Once, people compared themselves mainly with neighbours, colleagues and friends. Today they compare themselves with celebrities, influencers, billionaires and carefully edited lives from around the world. This creates a constant sense of relative deprivation. Even people who are objectively comfortable can feel cheated when everyone else appears richer, happier, more attractive or more successful.

That comparison feeds resentment. Resentment feeds anger. Anger, online, is rewarded.

Social media has changed the incentives of communication. Politeness rarely goes viral. Outrage does. A thoughtful comment may be ignored, while a cruel joke, public shaming or furious denunciation can attract instant attention. Over time, platforms teach people that certainty, contempt and emotional intensity are more effective than patience or nuance. The habits of online life do not stay online. They seep into politics, workplaces, customer service, family arguments and everyday encounters.

At the same time, many of the institutions that once taught cooperation and restraint have weakened. Local clubs, churches, unions, neighbourhood associations and extended family networks once gave people regular practice in compromise. You had to deal with people you disagreed with because they were still part of your community. Online, disagreement can be blocked, mocked or turned into performance. We have become better at forming tribes than building communities.

This helps explain the strange coexistence of entitlement and powerlessness. Many people feel they deserve more, yet also feel they have less control over their lives. A young person priced out of housing may sound entitled when demanding change, but that demand may also be a rational response to a broken promise. A customer abusing a worker, however, may be expressing a different form of entitlement: the belief that personal frustration justifies public disrespect. Both behaviours emerge from a culture in which anger has become normalised and social trust has been eroded.

The decline in politeness is therefore not simply a failure of manners. It is a symptom of a society under pressure. Courtesy depends on the belief that other people matter, that small acts of restraint are worthwhile and that we share some basic obligation to one another. When people feel unseen, cheated or constantly compared, that obligation weakens. The result is not necessarily a more selfish society, but a more reactive one.

This does not mean people are worse than they used to be. In many ways modern society is more inclusive, more aware of injustice and more willing to challenge abuse of power. But awareness without trust can become grievance. Equality without courtesy can become conflict. Freedom of expression without responsibility can become cruelty.

The challenge is not to lecture people into being nicer. It is to rebuild the conditions that make civility possible: fairer opportunity, stronger communities, healthier online spaces and a renewed respect for the ordinary rituals of public life. Saying thank you, waiting your turn, listening before attacking and remembering that the person on the other side of the counter, screen or argument is human—these are not trivial gestures. They are the small repairs by which social trust is maintained.

The little things matter. In fact, they may be where the larger battle for a decent society begins.

Have a listen. Click on the album cover: